the need for curation over being force-fed the algorithm (and AI!) is going to bubble up in every area of creativity. The human touch remains a vital part of our lives.
First, creators who publish citable work . Newsletter writers who go deep on one thing. Analysts who publish original data. Technical writers who explain complex topics in a way that can be pulled apart and quoted. Agents like them because they produce high-signal content, and humans trust them because when an agent says “Carly... See more
The only way I’m reading something is if there’s an extremely strong trust signal — which basically means it’s been written or boosted by someone I’ve heard of. Otherwise my default position is scepticism.
In such an environment, making it as a “nobody” is nearly impossible.
Something is shifting in the influencer landscape. The era of the polished macro influencer, massive reach, aspirational aesthetics, transactional brand deals is giving way to something more interesting: micro influencers who own a specific cultural territory and speak with a genuine point of view. Substack is part of this shift. Audiences are... See more
In a world of infinite content, the creator who curates, who brings taste, context, and a lived point of view, becomes the person people trust to guide them.
Curation and taste are a cultural chicken and egg, each fuels the other in a virtuous cycle: curators apply their taste to what they select, and exposure to that curation, in turn, refines everyone else’s.