Will
@wgbrown
Will
But all of the arguments being made today against using generative AI to answer questions sound exactly like the arguments against citing web pages as sources in the 1990s. The argument then was basically “ Anyone can publish anything on the web, and even if a web page is accurate today, it can be changed at any time ” — which was true then and rem... See more
John Gruber • ★ Don’t Throw the Baby Out With the Generative AI Bullshit Bathwater
One of the most intelligent case studies in design is the Chinese tea cup. They’re made without handles simply because if it’s too hot to touch, it’s too hot to drink.
Humans naturally want to add more. Add a cardboard sleeve, add a warning on the outside of the cup, add a handle. The result of all these things never cools down the actual contents.
... See moreURL: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/hvbvpz/what_life_changing_item_can_you_buy_for_less_than/
reddit.comTesting the writing function of Sublime.
Here’s a note which I’m adding to the thing I’m writing.
Commit to following through on what you’ve already planned or launched before you chase the next creative, experimental, or shiny idea. “Earn the right to build” and “have respect for sequencing” are principles I’ve internalized.
What I Learned at Clubhouse 📓
Tijn Tjoelker
embed.kumu.io
The real question is, where does scarcity still exist? It exists where it has always existed—in the distribution layer, with the limits on human attention. Artificial intelligence can generate abundance in creation, it can even create new currencies, but it cannot convert attention into currency. Only human beings can do that.
I’ll go even further ... See more
I’ll go even further ... See more