Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
cognitive science
Mary Martin • 1 card
In December 2011, Professor John Stein, a leading Oxford neuroscientist, wrote, “Claims are being made about brain research that just aren’t true, and they are being accepted
Malcolm Jeeves • Minds, Brains, Souls and Gods: A Conversation on Faith, Psychology and Neuroscience
William James
Steven Schlafman • 1 card
This is precisely what Jung fought against.3 He saw this for what it was: not science, but scienti... See more
Laura London • In Defense of Carl Jung: Beyond Scientific Dogma
validity”—that is, when the Rorschach reports that a test taker is depressive, or narcissistic, or overly dependent, that person is quite likely not to exhibit those traits at all.
Annie Murphy Paul • The Cult of Personality Testing: How Personality Tests Are Leading Us to Miseducate Our Children, Mismanage Our Companies, and Misunderstand Ourselves
Even though we have been in the post-Freudian era for some time, reductive versions of his ideas have become common-sense assumptions for many who have never read a word of his work.
Jonathan Crary • 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep
One of the people who most helped me to understand some aspects of these questions was Professor Joel Nigg, who I interviewed at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland.
Johann Hari • Stolen Focus: Why You Can't Pay Attention--and How to Think Deeply Again
Sigmund Freud, faisait de la recherche en neurophysiologie
Nicholas Carr • Internet rend-il bête ? (French Edition)
The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP, pronounced “sigh cop”) is the most aggressive antagonist of the paranormal today. As such, analysis of the group provides a wealth of insight. CSICOP’s personnel, its organizational structure, its operations, and its demographics tell us much about the paranormal an
... See more