Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World
amazon.com
So Bezos suggested that the personalization team develop a much simpler system, one that made recommendations based on books that customers had already bought. Eric Benson took about two weeks to construct a preliminary version that grouped together customers who had similar purchasing histories and then found books that appealed to the people in e
... See moreBrad Stone • The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon
The symbolists’ master algorithm is inverse deduction, the connectionists’ is backpropagation, the evolutionaries’ is genetic programming, the Bayesians’ is Bayesian inference, and the analogizers’ is
Pedro Domingos • The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World
Paul Graham
Steven Schlafman • 1 card
probabilities attach themselves to the descriptions of events and not to events themselves.
W. Brian Arthur • Complexity Economics: Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute's 2019 Fall Symposium
Netflix came to a similar conclusion for improving its recommendation algorithm. Decoding movies’ traits to figure out what you like was very complex and less accurate than simply analogizing you to many other customers with similar viewing histories. Instead of predicting what you might like, they examine who you are like, and the complexity is ca
... See moreDavid Epstein • Epstein_D_-_Range_Why_Generalists_Triumph_in_a_Specialized_World-Penguin_Publishing_Group_2019
As knowledge grows, scientists specialize ever more narrowly, but no one is able to put the pieces together because there are far too many pieces. Scientists collaborate, but language is a very slow medium of communication. Scientists try to keep up with others’ research, but the volume of publications is so high that they fall farther and farther
... See morePedro Domingos • The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World
case. If people were independent, each making decisions in isolation, societies would indeed be predictable, because all those random decisions would add up to a fairly constant average. But when people interact, larger assemblies can be less predictable than smaller ones, not more.