Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
Management & Leadership
sari and • 185 cards
Last and most important, we cap our Planning Pyramid with some necessary accountability. This is the who level, where your company identifies specifically which person is accountable for which particular activity on your plan. Please note that I didn’t say you should identify who’s “responsible,” because responsibility and accountability are two qu
... See moreVerne Harnish • Mastering the Rockefeller Habits
“If your thinking is sloppy, your business will be sloppy. If you are disorganized, your business will be disorganized. If you are greedy, your employees will be greedy, giving you less and less of themselves and always asking for more.” —MICHAEL
Michael W. Preis • 101 Things I Learned® in Business School (Second Edition)
every partner has an opinion on how the firm’s affairs should be conducted and believes that no decision should be made without his or her input.
David H. Maister • Managing The Professional Service Firm
I never had it as a major life goal to become an expert on business excellence. I was most concerned with finding a career in which I could get paid to have fun. But then something dramatic happened that changed everything. In a shocking nod to the Peter principle (“In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence”), I was p
... See moreJohn Spence • Awesomely Simple: Essential Business Strategies for Turning Ideas Into Action
If things don’t work out as planned, it’s unclear who is responsible for stepping in. With the advice process, the ownership for the decision stays clearly with one person: the decision maker.
Frederic Laloux • Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness
- Executives are forced to keep on “operating” unless they take positive action to change the reality in which they live and work.
Peter F. Drucker • The Effective Executive: The Definitive Guide to Getting the Right Things Done (Harperbusiness Essentials)
In the late 1990s, a group of midlevel students at GE’s Crotonville leadership institute challenged him, saying that the “#1, #2, fix, close, or sell” strategy was hurting the company because executives were gaming the system.