Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
offers nothing even remotely resembling an argument to show that he knows what conditions would produce good men, or that anybody knows. He cannot surely mean that mere conditions of physical comfort and mental culture produce good men; because manifestly they do not.
G. K. Chesterton • The G. K. Chesterton Collection [50 Books]
George Bilbrey
@gbilbrey

Does history warrant Renan’s conclusion that religion is necessary to morality—that a natural ethic is too weak to withstand the savagery that lurks under civilization and emerges in our dreams, crimes, and wars? Joseph de Maistre answered: “I do not know what the heart of a rascal may be; I know what is in the heart of an honest man; it is horribl
... See moreWill Durant • The Lessons of History
Darwinian evolution has great difficulty accounting for the existence of objective moral obligations.
J. Warner Wallace • A 30-Minute Overview of Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels (Faith Blueprints)
“How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature that interest him in the fortunes of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it.”
Jessica C. Flack • Worlds Hidden in Plain Sight: The Evolving Idea of Complexity at the Santa Fe Institute, 1984–2019 (Compass)
The Fairness/cheating foundation evolved in response to the adaptive challenge of reaping the rewards of cooperation without getting exploited. It makes us sensitive to indications that another person is likely to be a good (or bad) partner for collaboration and reciprocal altruism. It makes us want to shun or punish cheaters.
Jonathan Haidt • The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy (NONE)
amazon.com