Sublime

The philosopher Erik Wielenberg argues for this, what he calls “non-natural non-theistic moral realism.”

the indeterminacy of it all appeals to me.

Virtue cannot be limited to those with the means to practice it.

is Husak

but from the study of logic and mathematics. It’s a very weird framework that doesn’t come out of empiricism, but of a certain kind of armchair philosophizing that turned out to be very useful. So the minimality expectations can be dropped. You could have a very, very cumbersome computational system that produces the correct output. So that’s unlik

Brandom’s complex alternative is that our descriptions constitute a system of socially constituted rational commitments, and that only linguistic rules, socially articulated and enforced, are capable of giving our words any meaning at all. Saying something meaningful requires making explicit what is already implicit in our use of concepts, rather t

Philosopher Alvin Plantinga’s “Reformed epistemology” can be regarded as a variant of the presuppositionalist position.