Transitional Design
One of the biggest mistakes we make in our institutions is trying to reach a new paradigm through a top-down approach by creating collective agendas. This can be useful, but...
linkedin.commap complex wicked problems and their countless interrelated and interdependent issues within 5 archetypal areas:
1) infrastructural/science/technology issues; 2) political/legal issues; 3) social; 4) business/ economic; 5) environmental. And, these systems problems are permeated by social and cultural norms, practices, beliefs, assumptions,... See more
1) infrastructural/science/technology issues; 2) political/legal issues; 3) social; 4) business/ economic; 5) environmental. And, these systems problems are permeated by social and cultural norms, practices, beliefs, assumptions,... See more
Wicked Problems – Transition Design Seminar CMU
identifying system boundaries in order to choose where to contribute to change within wider wholes
Learning outcomes and systems change capabilities | Systems Change Learning Handbook
Learning Materials
schoolofsystemchange.orgA Brief Introduction to Co-design
theglasshouse.org.ukThe group developed a collective identity around being representatives of underserved communities, but the internal diversity of the group still allowed for constructive, transformative discussion (rather than defaulting to groupthink).
Humphrey Obuobi • Addressing Power Imbalances in Deliberation
“enclave deliberation,” is to have disadvantaged groups make sense of their situations in a more homogeneous and power-balanced setting. Especially in the face of political institutions that consistently disenfranchise lower socioeconomic classes, talking together about their experiences can help these groups develop a language for articulating... See more
Humphrey Obuobi • Addressing Power Imbalances in Deliberation
testimony is often embraced as a legitimate and meaningful contribution to deliberations. This is not to say that people with less are less capable of producing rational arguments, but rather to acknowledge that emotional appeals and the relation of lived experiences are crucial parts of argumentation.