What Is a Straw Man Argument? Definition and Examples
grammarly.com
What Is a Straw Man Argument? Definition and Examples
people are not very good at dealing with grey areas. for something to be argumentative, the idea should be expressed in extreme opposites. the middle is not to be talked about. so the logic is the same too, in logic, this is called the excluded middle.
Just a moment...
Most people immediately start with a straw man, poking holes in the weakest version of the other side’s case. He does the reverse: he considers the strongest version of their case, which is known as the steel man.10 A politician might occasionally adopt that tactic to pander or persuade, but like a good scientist, Harish does it to learn.
Adam Grant • Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know
The basic difference between an argument and a fight: an argument, done skillfully, gets people to want to do what you want. You fight to win; you argue to achieve agreement.
Jay Heinrichs • Thank You for Arguing, Third Edition
The real test of any argument is how well it stands up to rigorous criticism. When you’re confident in your viewpoint, you love a chance to throw it into the ring with other arguments and show off its strength. It works like boxing: the stronger the opponents you’ve beaten, the better your ranking. That’s why a strong college paper always includes
... See moreTim Urban • What's Our Problem?: A Self-Help Book for Societies
Most people immediately start with a straw man, poking holes in the weakest version of the other side’s case. He does the reverse: he considers the strongest version of their case, which is known as the steel man.
Adam Grant • Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know
Ad Hominem
(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.
(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.