I think ownership is overrated - there is a certain kind of person who sees something and whose first reaction is "i want to own it", ownership as a means to accrue value leads to a community of vultures; instead of ownership, we should think about "contribution" as the primitive
I think ownership is overrated - there is a certain kind of person who sees something and whose first reaction is "i want to own it", ownership as a means to accrue value leads to a community of vultures; instead of ownership, we should think about "contribution" as the primitive
People should be able to own their data and decide if they want to sell it
James Beshara • Below the Line with James Beshara on Apple Podcasts
You could also own it as an owner where you started the company. Ownership is really important. [10]
Tim Ferriss • The Almanack of Naval Ravikant: A Guide to Wealth and Happiness
Web3 is often referenced as an important part of the “ownership economy,” in large part because it enables creators to monetize in creative ways while owning both their work and a part of the platforms. But creator tokens can start to take us down a more dystopian path in the ownership economy — one where the fans start to own the creators. The (of... See more
Alana Levin • Bowie Bonds as Early Creator Tokens
The concept of ownership is so deeply embedded in our lives that it’s difficult to imagine how the world would look if that were taken away. Imagine if the clothes you bought could be worn only in the venue you bought them in. What if you couldn’t resell or reinvest in your house or car? Or what if you had to change your name wherever you went? Thi... See more
Chris Dixon • 16 insights from New York Times bestseller Read Write Own - a16z crypto
Whereas "democracy" was redefined to mean "access", "ownership" risks being abstracted away to mean little more than "exposure to upside". Yes, having the ability for users to capture more value is good, but does it qualify as "ownership"?
Austin Robey • Ways to improve the ownership economy — Mirror
