The Minimum Viable Testing Process for Evaluating Startup Ideas
review.firstround.comreview.firstround.com
Saved by Mark Fishman and
The Minimum Viable Testing Process for Evaluating Startup Ideas
Rethinking the startup MVP: Building a competitive product | Linear
linear.app
If we were to try to test an entire idea, we would have to build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP). The problem with MVPs is right there in the name — “product.” MVPs offer the perfect excuse to skip assumption testing and start building your product instead. While you may intend for that initial MVP to be small in scope, it often shifts in definition... See more
Daniel Kyne • 15 Methods For Testing Your Assumptions [Research Guide] // OpinionX — Free Stack Ranking Surveys
Consider nontraditional MVPs The most common approach to building an MVP is scoping down and building the smallest feature set that delivers on your UVP. This is the Release 1.0 MVP validation recipe. There are three more validation recipes, though, that enable you to go a lot faster than the traditional approach:
Ash Maurya • Running Lean
When we shift away from testing our idea and focus instead on assumptions, we replace the MVP with the RAT — Riskiest Assumption Test — which follows this three-step process:
- List the assumptions that must be true for your idea to succeed.
- Identify which individual assumption is most important for this success.
- Design and conduct a test to prove wheth