Saved by Marcel Mairhofer and
The Decision Matrix: How to Prioritize What Matters
Note-and-Vote. Be practical. Consider differentiation (“What advice would I give a new team member to make sure we follow through on our differentiation?”) and safeguards (“How can we protect against success that harms our customers?”). The Decider chooses three-ish principles. (p. 106) Fill out the Mini Manifesto Put your 2x2 and principles in one
... See moreJohn Zeratsky • Click: How to Make What People Want
To implement Prioritize and Execute in any business, team, or organization, a leader must: • evaluate the highest priority problem. • lay out in simple, clear, and concise terms the highest priority effort for your team. • develop and determine a solution, seek input from key leaders and from the team where possible. • direct the execution of that
... See moreJocko Willink , Leif Babin • Extreme Ownership
They grouped the initiatives in terms of which themes each project supported and then stack-ranked them in terms of the contribution they believed each initiative would have—that is, they associated each initiative with the outcome they thought the work would create and showed how those outcomes would support the strategic goals expressed by leader
... See moreJosh Seiden • Sense and Respond: How Successful Organizations Listen to Customers and Create New Products Continuously
Real world prioritization is not that different from the matrix above. That is, it’s based on subjective criteria, weights and grades. Despite some flaws, I feel the matrix is effective. I’d rather have an imperfect process than no process at all. The matrix method forces the decision maker to think and articulate what’s important. Is revenue more
... See more