The case for rereading
rereading a book can often be a more significant, dramatic, and, yes, new experience than encountering an unfamiliar work.
Alan Jacobs • The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction
... While texts often build and maintain an internal and pre-set collection of references in the form of footnotes, prior foundational texts, or subtle cultural “calls” to “events or people or tropes of the time and place the text was written,” it’s a far more personal practice to form one’s own links in an inter-textual manner.... See more
I’d like to think
Édouard Urcades
("JP") added
Omar Hassan added
But Quentin believed in reading as a lifeline to the past—to the store of experience that made the foundation of our species. By assembling our thoughts like risers in a staircase the generations would climb. Those who could draw from this reservoir would exist beyond the jealous shackles of time, grasp the utterness of contingency, and know the wi
... See moreGreg Jackson • The Dimensions of a Cave
Debbie Foster added
Sari Azout • The End of Productivity
Rania El-Ghezzaoui added
James Somers
“Our investment in reading changes the book because the book has changed us. ... If books are merely a means of transferring information, then perhaps, yes, a book is a waste of time. If a summary of its thesis and key points could be presented in a brief article or Substack post, why not just save the hours and read the Substack post? All the more
... See moreJo added
First, when a person is engrossed in literature, the mind can stay attuned to its content instead of “toxic thoughts.” Second, an understanding of the text comes not only while reading, but also when we take those thoughts with us into other mental states. We’re able to reflect on what we’ve read when we’ve turned out attentions elsewhere, even whe
... See moreJoel J Miller • What Monks Know About Focus
Jonathan Simcoe added