slippery slope fallacy - Google Search
updated 12d ago
updated 12d ago
The way a slippery slope argument goes is that if we do something, call it X, then there is a serious risk that it will start a trend, which will lead to other things such as Y and Z, and although X in and of itself is fine, maybe even a good idea, Y and Z are pretty scary. The conclusion is that you shouldn’t do X unless you are willing to accept
... See moreThe problem with most slippery slope arguments is that they do not provide any evidence of an actual slope:
Peter Hagen added
Tenbrunsel and Messick identify the proverbial “slippery slope” as another enabler of the kind of self-deception that leads to ethical fading. With each ethical transgression that is tolerated, we pave the road for more and bigger ethical transgressions.
("JP") added
the proverbial “slippery slope” as another enabler of the kind of self-deception that leads to ethical fading.
Moi Jamri added
the fallacy of “we tried that, didn’t work” via dhh:
no logical fallacy provides as much of an obstacle as “we tried that, didn’t work”. The fallacy that past failed attempts dictates the scope of what's possible.
That just because someone, somewhere, one time attempted something similar and failed, nobody else should try. That lowering our collectiv
... See moresari and added