Saved by Isabelle Levent
Is using Lensa art theft? | The ethics of AI generated art
Where AI differs is its interaction with data and rights. Unlike coding assistants trained on open-source software, most commercial image generation tools are trained on copyrighted work. It’s a non-consensual, extractive practice in an already-precarious industry. It’s always hard to put the tech genie back in the box, but I think this is a case w... See more
Isabelle Levent added
Isabelle Levent and added
sari added
But AI generated art cannot be used legally commercially because it cannot be copyrighted.
Muddy Colors • Robots vs. Lawyers
Leo Guinan added
While I'm sympathetic to many already struggling creators who will find fewer commissions and opportunities, I also think the genie is out of the lamp on this one. While there are probably some legal, technological, and social mechanisms to slow the use of these tools—I've heard of calls to boycott AI generated art—we cannot stop their widespread u
... See moreJason Shen • 131: How to Be Human in the Age of Generative AI
Jason Shen added
When I hear artists and AI evangelists argue about whether people who generate text using ChatGPT or images using Midjourney are truly creative, I wonder about the question behind the question.
Elan Ullendorff • A brief history of creativity (and power)
Alex Dobrenko added
This Tool Could Protect Artists From A.I.-Generated Art That Steals Their Style
Kashmir Hillnytimes.comBianca Aguilar added
example of artists' counter efforts