But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
Chuck Klostermanamazon.com
But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
As recently as the 1980s, the idea of “emotional intelligence” was not taken seriously, particularly by men; today, most professions regard it as important as any scholastic achievement. In a hundred years, qualitative intelligence might be unilaterally prioritized over quantitative aptitude.
Chuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
Especially as tech increasingly overtakes our Intellectual intelligence capacotiesyhe internetAI
We classify the octopus as intelligent because of its ability to do human things, based on the accepted position that we are the most intelligent species on Earth.
Chuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
I sometimes suspect that—just after the Industrial Revolution—the ongoing evolution of society accelerated beyond the speed human consciousness could evolve alongside it.
Chuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
We spend our lives learning many things, only to discover (again and again) that most of what we’ve learned is either wrong or irrelevant.
Chuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
for why smart people tend to be wrong as often as their not-so-smart peers—they work from the flawed premise that their worldview is standard.
Chuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
We understand the past through the words of those who experienced it. But those individuals aren’t necessarily reliable, and we are reminded of this constantly. The average person can watch someone attack a cop with a hammer and misdescribe what he saw twenty minutes after it happened.
Chuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
Philosophically, as a species, we are committed to this. In the same way that religion defined cultural existence in the pre-Copernican age, the edge of science defines the existence we occupy today.
Chuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
These are constants like “the mass of an electron” and “the strength of gravity,” all of which have been precisely measured and never change. These twenty numbers appear inconceivably fine-tuned—in fact, if these numbers didn’t have the exact value that they do, nothing in the universe would exist. They are so perfect that it almost appears as if s
... See moreChuck Klosterman • But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
It’s an even more basic entity. It’s something that—when arranged in a specific way—builds space and time. But if those ingredients were somehow arranged differently, the concepts of space and time wouldn’t even apply.”