archive.is
I chose Discourse for my community because I wanted to build something that couldn’t be quietly corrupted. Where power is visible, distributed, and accountable. Where if I ever turn into the villain of my own story, people can see it happening and have tools to respond. It’s not a perfect solution. But it’s better than trusting my own benevolence... See more
archive.is
Joan Westenberg on building, open online communities.
But if you’re building a community that’s meant to be a resource, a knowledge base, a place where people come to learn and discuss ideas that matter, you should think carefully about the governance structure. Who has power? How is that power checked? What happens when someone abuses it? Can the community see what’s happening?
archive.is
Joan Westenberg on building open, online communities.
For me, that option was Discourse.
When I delete a post, people can see that it was deleted. When I ban someone, the ban is logged. When I’m making decisions about how the community should run, those discussions happen in public threads where everyone can participate.
Could I still abuse this system? Of course. But it would be a lot harder to do... See more
When I delete a post, people can see that it was deleted. When I ban someone, the ban is logged. When I’m making decisions about how the community should run, those discussions happen in public threads where everyone can participate.
Could I still abuse this system? Of course. But it would be a lot harder to do... See more
archive.is
Joan Westenberg on building open, online communities.
Instead of a shared resource being depleted through overuse, we have shared social resources being corrupted through concentrated control.
archive.is
Joan Westenberg on open communities.
What we’ve built, in other words, is a system of tiny dictatorships masquerading as communities.
archive.is
Joan Westenberg referencing Discord, Slack etc.