Sublime

non-equilibrium physics).

so deeply uncomfortable saying, “I don’t know” or “it depends,” especially in finance.

Perhaps the greatest “phase transition” in our thinking that such an approach could engender is the maturation in our willingness to live with relatively high levels of uncertainty in the domains of complex phenomena—and thus give up on ideas like complete “cures,” the elimination of “risk,” the design of perfect “stability,” and achieving total

We also need to get better at communicating climate science. Societal decisions that balance costs and drawbacks against risks and benefits must be made fully informed of the certainties and uncertainties in our scientific understanding.

While scientific progress, then, proceeds by curiously exploring adjacent possibilities, preference is given to work closely tied to existing science and conducted by a privileged subset of scientists.

By physics, I mean approximation, compression, mechanism, optimization. Data science is not that. Data science is not science. I think it’s important that we make that statement.

At the same time, we need to reduce the hysteria in climate journalism.