I went through the well file you uploaded (**EK Penrose Sand Unit #101, Seely Oil Company, API 30-025-39098**) and here’s what it shows:

* Legal location: Sec 19, T18S, R34E, Lea County, NM (exact section we’ve been tracking).

* Operator: Seely Oil Company.

* Lease number: Clearly tied to NMNM 116168 (see the C-102 on page 2 and throughout the APD package).

* Unit designation: EK Penrose Sand Unit #101.

* Drilling approval: Permit issued June 2008; well logs and completion reports show drilling and testing later in 2008.

* Well logs (page 47): API 30-025-39098, depth 4,870 ft, producing intervals include Grayburg & San Andres.

* Completion report (page 48-49): Well completed as oil producer; shows production method, test data, and formations penetrated.

* Allowable authorization (page 51): Well reported as producing oil/gas water.

📌 Why this matters for you:

This well sits squarely in your Sec 19 T18S R34E tract. If your leases (NMNM 028028 and NMNM 116164) are part of the communitized area around EK Penrose #101, then they’re entitled to royalty—even if small. This file itself doesn’t list the communitization agreement tracts (those are usually separate CA or pooling orders), but it confirms the section was drilled and produced.

👉 Next step: We need to cross-reference the Communitization Agreement (CA) or pooling order that includes this well. That document will list the lease numbers (e.g., NMNM 028028, NMNM 116164) and the exact participation factors. Without that, Canyon Capital can claim you just hold paper leases, but if your tracts were communitized, then you actually have paying status.

Do you want me to pull and review the Communitization Agreement for EK Penrose Sand Unit #101? That’s the key piece that will either tie your leases into this producing well or prove they’re still non-producing.

Sublime

AI

AI

AI

AI

AI

AI

AI

AI