roy williams
@roywilliams
roy williams
@roywilliams
We perceive through images. We think in metaphors. We learn by stories. We create with fantasy.
Story telling, one step at a time.
Stories. “Can you tell me a story about something that matters to you?” That’s the only prompt we used, for audio-recorded stories. Marvellous. There is a whole practice behind that simple question. If you’re interested, ask me for more …
From Lily Chambers:
I genuinely do not care if AI tools make me more productive.
I am tired of seeing, "increased productivity" as a selling point. I do not want to be valued for my productivity. I do not want "more" of anything related to work.
I like doing things meticulously. I like using my hands. I like manipulating data that an LLM could inter
... See more:))) Roy
The document explores how scalability, the ability to expand without changing the framework, has shaped modern projects, economies, and knowledge, leading to a loss of transformative diversity.
asletaiwan.orgScalability
Does it mean spread? Taking up space? The space of ‘others’?
Surely scalability can mean an increase in connection, contact, non-‘GDP’ growth?
Diversity is growth, no? Emergent (complex-adaptive emergence, if you really want to know) is embedded in diversity, indistinguishable from it.
And does precision have to be malevolent? Surely not ... (emergent precision, anyone?)
Having worked with emergence, and emergent learning, (for some years) which is simply ‘ordered but not predictable’ (or the world of unruly variables) I would think not.
Of course, it is possible to shoe-horn (violence of the metaphor intended) precision and scalability into obedient variables, but that is to discount the whole of organic life, which happens to include us (H. ‘sapiens’) and most of the ‘critters’ on this planet.
I guess that depends on whether you like change or not. And even more so on whether you value adapting to change, not just change in scale, but in essence.