Neha Sathish

insight is not a synonym for intimacy. That understanding isn’t the same as feeling.

It’s not that I don’t have feelings. I do. In fact, I have an entire catalogue of them. I just prefer to curate them. To run them through a filter. I want to feel my emotions like you might watch a storm from the safety of a porch: visible, narratable, but never threatening to soak you through.

I’ve become adept at this kind of elegant dissociation. I can name my fear of abandonment while smiling politely. I can identify self-destructive patterns and then offer a footnote about their Freudian implications. I can say “I think that made me feel deeply rejected” in the same tone I use to order an iced chai. I have turned my emotional life into a case study and myself into its most diligent researcher.

And it’s not entirely my fault. I come from a long line of people who didn’t know what to do with a feeling once it showed up. We didn’t talk about emotions. We endured them. Or ignored them. Or let them detonate in unpredictable ways at dinner.

There were no family mantras about communication or introspection. No inherited tools for regulation. Only instincts for survival. We expressed ourselves through slammed doors, long silences, or the subtle weaponization of tone. If someone cried, you left the room. If someone got angry, you got quiet. Emotions were either volcanic or invisible, and you learned early to tiptoe around both.

So of course I learned to manage feelings by analyzing them. I named them, tamed them, pinned them under glass like specimens. I didn’t inherit the language for them. I had to reverse-engineer it. Build it from the rubble. Teach myself to translate.

you cannot theorize your way out of suffering. You cannot spreadsheet your way to softness. You cannot build an academic fortress strong enough to keep the ache at bay.

Grief is not impressed by your vocabulary. Shame does not care how many psychology books you’ve read. Loneliness cannot be pacified with a well-written caption.

All my cleverness, all my articulation, all my gorgeously worded epiphanies are like the wrapping paper around a box I am simply too afraid to open.

And maybe the work isn’t in describing the box.

Maybe it’s in opening it.

Maybe it’s in letting the feeling knock something loose inside me. Letting it take its shoes off and stay for a while. Letting myself be less composed, less coherent. Letting myself unravel just enough to remember I am a living thing, not a thesis.

I think there’s a common misunderstanding that healing is a kind of ascension. That if you do enough journaling and attend enough therapy and say the right affirmations into the mirror every morning, you’ll eventually transcend the mess of it all. You’ll become someone who no longer gets jealous, or anxious, or sad on birthdays. You’ll float somewhere above the drama, calmly observing your triggers from a detached and spiritually enlightened distance.

But I’m beginning to suspect the opposite is true. That real healing is not becoming less affected by life, but more. That it’s not about feeling less pain, but finally allowing yourself to feel it without shame or explanation or a PowerPoint.

Maybe healing is not about becoming fluent in the language of pain. Maybe it’s about letting the pain speak its own dialect, in a voice that’s raw and messy and occasionally mortifying.

Even if it doesn’t say anything particularly profound.

Even if all it says is:
“I’m here.”
“I’m real.”
“Please don’t turn me into an essay just yet.”