Nandani Agarwal
@nandani
Nandani Agarwal
In the MIP-G model, a team's social motivational factor reflects whether its members operate with a more prosocial or pro-self stance, which shapes how this team processes information (De Dreu et al., 2008; De Dreu & Beersma, 2010). When prosocial motivation prevails within a team, members work towards collective goals and tend to process... See more
Just a moment...
MIP-G theory
understand why transformational leadership may foster team functioning, previous research has focused on intermediate team states such as team commitment, empowerment, or shared team goals that benefit from transformational leadership and in turn can explain positive effects of transformational leadership on team functioning (Chi and Huang, 2014, D... See more
How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A ...
similarly, we know mindful leaders - promote productivity but what we don’t know is how?
Drawing on the mindfulness literature, we propose that mindfulness in communication consists of three facets: (a) being present and paying attention in conversations, (b) an open, non-judging attitude, and (c) a calm, non-impulsive manner
Frontiers | Mindfulness and Leadership: Communication as a Behavioral Correlate of Leader Mindfulness and Its Effect on Follower Satisfaction
mindfulness in communication
socioemotional communication area, criticizing others (i.e., disparaging or offending comments about other team members or other organizational members external to the team) can be similarly harmful for team problem-solving interactions.
How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A ...
negative socio comm in teams
leader indirect communication encourages teams' active engagement in information exchange and reflection.
Just a moment...
leader comm promotes info exchange and reflection in teams
For leaders, by stating messages indirectly, they are better to address sensitive issues, avoid direct confrontation or create space for subordinates' initiative and independent thinking (Davenport & Leitch, 2005; Eisenberg, 1984; Hwang, 1987).
Just a moment...
how indirect communication helps?
mindfulness can foster effective indirect comm?
The MIP-G model suggests that teams operate as information processors, driven by two orthogonal motivational forces: epistemic factor and social factor (Bechtoldt et al., 2010; De Dreu et al., 2008). The epistemic motivational factor regulates how deeply teams search for and process information (De Dreu et al., 2008) and is closely associated with... See more
Just a moment...
MIP-G theory
Social information processing theory (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978) posits that teams attend to social cues in the work environment to interpret and navigate organizational dynamics. Leaders, through their communication, provide these social cues, helping their team members make sense of their contexts (Chiang et al., 2021; Copeland, 1994).
Just a moment...
SIP theory
As team-based structures become increasingly common in modern organizations (Schwartz et al., 2019), and along with their unique characteristics involving knowledge-intensive tasks and interdependent activities that require collective interpretation, problem-solving and continuous adaptation (Schippers et al., 2017; West, 2000), leader indirect... See more
Just a moment...
how leader comm is imp for team effectiveness