MK
@mkay
MK
@mkay
That changed when social networking became social media around 2009, between the introduction of the smartphone and the launch of Instagram. Instead of connection—forging latent ties to people and organizations we would mostly ignore—social media offered platforms through which people could publish content as widely as possible, well beyond their
... See more![Thumbnail of Towards Recommender System Optimization: Our Data Tool for Algorithmic Optimization on Spotify [Part 1]](https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/6206e1343aa2f122195717f8/6310b1a1447a22ac785a50ae_alina-grubnyak-ZiQkhI7417A-unsplash%20(1).jpg)
A social network is an idle, inactive system—a Rolodex of contacts, a notebook of sales targets, a yearbook of possible soul mates. But social media is active—hyperactive, really—spewing material across those networks instead of leaving them alone until needed.
A democratic cultural politics would be developmentalist — oriented to learning, growth and discovery — rather than presentist.

Flattening and taste
On the old internet, you could show a different side of yourself in every forum or chat room; but on your Facebook feed, you had to be the same person to everyone you knew.
Spotify, for example, has invested heavily in its own curation services — both algorithmic and human — after finding that many of its listeners were baffled by superabundance, burdened by excessive choice and uninterested in charting their own paths through the digital wilderness.