Jayson Clark

The document discusses a case where the state failed to provide sufficient evidence to detain a defendant before trial, leading to a reversal of the decision and remand for reevaluation.

The document discusses the State's timely filing of a petition to deny the defendant's pretrial release and the court's finding of clear and convincing evidence that defendant committed robbery.

The document discusses the State's untimely petition for pretrial detention of a defendant who remained in custody after the abolition of monetary bail under the Illinois Pretrial Fairness Act.

The appeal addresses the legality of the State's petition seeking pretrial detention of the defendant under the SAFET Act's provisions, determining it was valid under the Code.

Defendant appeals denial of pretrial release for aggravated battery. Court finds State failed to prove no conditions can mitigate threat, reversing trial court’s decision. Remanded for further proceedings.

The court dismissed the defendant's appeal challenging pretrial detention under the SAFE-T Act because the notice of appeal lacked proper arguments and support as required by the rules.

The case involves an appeal by the defendant, challenging a court's order denying pretrial release under the Safety, Accountability, Fairness, and Equity-Today (SAFE-T) Act before its effective date.

The defendant appeals the trial court's order granting the State's petition to deny his pretrial release under the SAFE-T Act, arguing the petition was untimely and seeks a remand.

A defendant appeals pretrial detention, arguing against an unlawful search and seizure claim and insufficient evidence showing he posed a real and present threat. The court's decision is affirmed.