Social Platform Trust & Safety
exploring the bounds of social platforms’ responsibility to keep the spaces safe
Social Platform Trust & Safety
Some users may not want to see any potentially abusive content at all, while others may, for example, need to sift through banal personal attacks in order to track credible death threats. The point, however, is that users themselves should be able to exercise significantly more agency over their own social media experience.
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.orgTruth Queries as misinformation intervention
Duco+TnS+MRR-+FINAL
A comprehensive report highlighting the importance of investment in the trust and safety industry, emphasizing its growth potential, corporate benefits, and role in fostering safer online environments amidst emerging technologies.
LinkDuco Trust & Safety Market Research Report (Katie Harbath)
Bonfire
bonfirenetworks.org
User research about ways to counter mininformation in social networks - from Bonfire
In a world where AI agents are running wild, will we see a new wave of online social spaces that are “human only” - or at least “human verified”?
What are the tradeoffs between Government ID vs. “Selfie verification” (Bumble-style) vs. organizations acting as verifiers (Bluesky-style) vs. peer-to-peer “vouch for humanity” (lobste.rs-style) vs.
With a few exceptions, by far the most important component of successful speech communities is that its moderators have faces . A core feature of bulletin boards, comment threads on blogs, and publications is that the boundaries of acceptable speech are enforced not by tech executives, the farcical Facebook Supreme Court,[xii] or distant buildings... See more
Ari Schulman • Why Speech Platforms Can Never Escape Politics | National Affairs
Jay Van Bavel, PhD (@jayvanbavel.bsky.social)
bsky.app