peer review

workin

The goal shifted from telling polished stories to uncovering useful truths.

You can curate and assess science without an editor.

We’re in a bit of a catch-22 as a scientific community in that we don’t have a solution to jump to, but we also can’t develop one well if we continue with journals. Prohibiting journals is our deliberate forcing function as we support such development at Astera and The Navigation Fund. By removing journals as an option, our scientists have to get m... See more

It is deficient to think that open peer-review—with the novel twist of being made available for public consumption—must recreate the review style that takes place in traditional journals. There’s no reason that peer review must always require reviewers to assess every aspect of a paper

Can we enable a more deliberate process during literature reviews for researchers to leave some mark of assessment of papers that they read, if not in full, then at least of the facets that they considered for their own research? When I read a book on my Kindle, I have the option to highlight passages and make private notes. I also have the option ... See more