Ethereum

Yes, we’ve scaled via rollups, but one of the few remaining use cases for Ethereum is settlement and DA. If the very few applications that actually accrue any source of value back to Ethereum are forced to leave due to constrained DA capacity, what source of value will Ethereum have left?

Just as falling compute costs unlocked the internet boom, lower transaction fees will unlock new application categories and use cases. The main comparison here is that general-purpose compute and coordination layers are more akin to AWS or Linux than HTTP. Ethereum and Solana are not simply “settling” transactions, but enabling programmable state... See more

The end goal for Ethereum is to become the financial layer for global coordination.

At the end of the day, continued fiscal deficits will increase US public debts, which requires more liquidity, more monetization and more currency debasement.

Which is good news for holders of scarce assets (equities, RE, gold, BTC, crypto).

And now, I think what comes next is real consumer tokens. Tokens that combine the expansive ambitions of top infrastructure projects, with the belief systems, cultural value, and social properties of memecoins. Tokens connected to product and social experiences that people actually care about instead of vaporware. Tokens from projects that are... See more

But there’s a perception now that all the smartest people are over buying smart contract chains. Smart people know the jig is up. If not now, then soon. The only people buying here are suckers—Uber drivers, Tom Lee, and KOLs who say stuff like “trillions.” And maybe the US Treasury. But not the smart money.

This is bullshit.I don’t believe it, and... See more

In contrast, based rollups direct user transactions to block builders who manage both Ethereum and the rollup. This use of Ethereum’s infrastructure allows based rollups to benefit from the same guarantees provided by Ethereum, enabling transactions to achieve finality more reliably than in non-based rollups.

To address this, the community chose a rollup-centric approach. The idea is simple: Instead of hosting all applications on Ethereum, the focus is on rollups that offer faster, cheaper transactions while still settling back on Ethereum. As a result, you get faster, cheaper transactions, but still keep Ethereum’s security.

PoS – Imagine a PoS network with 1mm validators, costing $100mm p.a. to run. Users pay $200mm p.a. in REV, and the chain issues $800mm in tokens p.a. to stakers. Operators take a 10% cut on TEV ($100mm here). The “profit = fees – issuance” proponents will say this is unsustainable: $200mm fees – $800mm issuance = $600mm loss! This doesn’t hold up.

... See more