artificious intelligence
What does it mean to do good enough work in the age of AI? Is there a place for not being an AI absolutist?
artificious intelligence
What does it mean to do good enough work in the age of AI? Is there a place for not being an AI absolutist?
When it comes to AI, I believe that prioritizing adaptability over resistance will serve us better in the long run. We didn’t abandon writing after the printing press, and we won’t stop thinking because of AI. Our skills will settle around overseeing and evaluating, instead of raw creation. This shift will be uncomfortable—we’ll likely lose some
... See moreIf nothing else, AI has prompted introspection on creative methodologies, a reappraisal of our relationship to technology. We must question. What is it that we do that a machine will never be able to? What is an essentially “human” typographic experience? Can AI be fully commanded, and interrogated, or will technology sanitize our vision and
... See moreWhat is it that I do that a machine will never be able to?
Why AI Will Widen the Gap Between Superstars and Everybody Else
« You won’t lose your job to AI, you’ll lose your job to someone using AI. »
This is another recurring idea in the public discourse. I don’t like it. I think it instills fear by stressing the idea of scarcity (jobs will be lost) and asking people to compete for the now scarce resource (learn AI or suffer).
I prefer a more benevolent stance, even
... See moreI’ve always hated that stock phrase as well. This is a brilliant reframe
When do I know if I'm becoming lazy and too reliant on AI, while justifying its use as "being productive" tool? Do I have the self-awareness to understand that?
What are we for?