20241108 Weekly
Collection for weekly Top 5 newsletter.
20241108 Weekly
If you can’t convey verbally everything in three points, do it in seven. Also, say up front and repeatedly that there are seven points, so that when you get to the fifth one, your listeners aren’t wondering if that’s the last one or if there are 20 more.
Understandably by Bill Murphy Jr. • 7 More Things, This Time About Persuasion
Chad Hudson added 17d
We do this with teaching consistently. Three is the magic number. I’m not sure why the rest of the numbers work well, I have always heard three, but it would stand up to reason the others are equally as effective.
It is funny how the brain functions, we can absorb so much if we pre-seed it and prepare it for what is coming.
That is why framing conversations also works well. Here is what we are going to discuss…brain is like oh ok cool, got it, let’s go.
It is also a reason pretexting works so well in social engineering attacks. We frame what we want the brain to think and understand, so when the attack commences, the brain doesn’t red flag it, it expects the condition.
Is that so bad? Isn't it common for skills to disappear when technology makes them obsolete? There aren't many blacksmiths left, and it doesn't seem to be a problem.
Yes, it's bad. The reason is something I mentioned earlier: writing is thinking. In fact there's a kind of thinking that can only be done by writing. You can't make this point better th
... See morePaul Graham • Writes and Write-Nots
Chad Hudson added 17d
This is one major reason I write; to continue to think, to process things. Sure, I use AI considerably in a lot of areas, like summarizing things, pulling out key points or to-dos, I even have it evaluate what I write, fix grammar, test the content to see if it is unique, cohesive, or compelling.
But, I don’t want to offload all of my thinking to AI and stop thinking. Similar to Paul’s point in the article, we used to get strong by working, now we workout to gain strength because working, in most cases, doesn’t provide this benefit for us.
I want to think and to think well. One of my favorite books this year is, “Clear Thinking” by Shane Parrish. I have invested a lot of time and energy into learning improve my thinking. It would be a shame to outsource it to token prediction algorithms.
We are beating the dealer on this one now at Axios by communicating internally the way we communicate with readers. It started with what we call 5 Big Things—a weekly newsletter, all in Smart Brevity, that details in order of importance what we’re thinking or doing. It is blunt, fun and essential. ... Roy had the genius idea of having every executi
... See moreJim VandeHei, Mike Allen, • Smart Brevity
Chad Hudson added 17d
Oh this resonated. Part of the issue I run into when thinking of writing a newsletter is the sheer amount of input I have. How do I filter down the most important things.
I like the idea of the 5 Big Things, it forces me to pick the one favorite article per day and discuss it. Then release on Friday with the Top 5 Favorites or whatever.
Seems helpful for their situation, as well. I work on a wide variety of initiatives daily. Top 5 Most Impactful or something similar might be helpful for the blog we are starting to discuss our projects around IT and Security.
Ideas related to this collection