
Yes, LLMs Can Be Better at Search Than Traditional Search

If you’re an expert navigating a novel problem, an LLM won’t imagine a new solution for you. But they become a gift for generalists, who can use them to get up to speed in new domains much more quickly, and resurface and apply knowledge from other fields easily. Generalists can use their adaptability and imagination to work through any “wickedness”... See more
Why Generalists Own the Future
Humans are bad at coming up with search queries. Humans are good at incrementally narrowing down options with a series of filters, and pointing where they want to go next. This seems obvious, but we keep building interfaces for finding information that look more like Google Search and less like a map.
All information tools have to give users some wa... See more
All information tools have to give users some wa... See more
thesephist.com • Navigate, don't search
Because if you strip LLMs to their essence, they are just a much better way of using statistics to aggregate human intelligence and connect everything we’ve all done together to get more use out of it.
Sari Azout
Unlike vertical search aggregators, boutique search engines feel less like yellow pages, and more like texting your friends to ask for a recommendation. They have constrained supply, which is the foundation for their biggest moat - trust. Importantly, boutique search engines introduce new business models that don’t rely on advertising.
Sari Azout • Re-Organizing the World’s Information: Why We Need More Boutique… — Mirror
The best emphasis should be on "finding," not searching. The need is for filters of a more refined, catered kind.
Adam Oram • Shirky: Problem is filter failure, not info overload
