I find explaining any actually interesting idea usually requires explaining like 5 subsidiary ideas. If you’re lucky. If you’re unlucky it’s like 25 and either they’re ready for a three hour lecture or you’re not going to succeed.
Emmett Shearx.comI find explaining any actually interesting idea usually requires explaining like 5 subsidiary ideas. If you’re lucky. If you’re unlucky it’s like 25 and either they’re ready for a three hour lecture or you’re not going to succeed.
“The tactics for getting status WITHIN the group are directly opposed to the tactics for spreading the message BEYOND the group”
In groups where this dynamic is particularly strong, it stunts their ability to affect the world beyond their own walls
The whole metamodern / integral / game b / ... See more
Rudra Dakinix.comI’ve sat through hundreds of portfolio presentations. I usually walk away with the same takeaway after a presentation from someone who comes from a Big Tech company: what did they do?!
I think there are two reasons for this:
Gabriel Valdiviax.comDebating people with poor comprehension is usually a waste of time and energy. Everything you say will be misunderstood or not understood at all. You will end up trying to teach what they should have learned in primary school - and you will mostly fail.
Mobility Daddyx.com