
If we were designed to think solo, monologue would be easier than dialogue. Dialogue involves INCREDIBLY complex acts of prediction, coordination, task-switching and mind-reading--yet we find it MUCH easier than monologue. Why? Maybe thinking is a bicycle built for 2. https://t.co/NNK2OYgWX9

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) • Mistaking fluent speech for fluent thought
Thinking, then, is a kind of download of exchanges with other people. And of course the process can happen in reverse, when an internal exchange becomes the template for an interaction. The essential point is that there is an ongoing interaction between the interpersonal (the self and the other) and the intrapersonal (within the self).
Joshua Wolf Shenk • Powers of Two: Finding the Essence of Innovation in Creative Pairs
We are defining dialogue as a particular type of conversation in which we choose to suspend our strongly held views in service of exploring new possibilities. Few people engage in dialogue at work.
Paul Lawrence • The Wise Leader: A Practical Guide for Thinking Differently About Leadership
Both animating conflict and absorbing conversation draw on the same two elements: a shared framework to provide common ground, and sufficient difference to keep things novel and surprising.
Joshua Wolf Shenk • Powers of Two: Finding the Essence of Innovation in Creative Pairs
whether it was important to understand the internal mental structure of the individual.
Ernest Davis • Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust
So often, we assume that real thinking—serious thinking—is done alone, bent over a book or a notepad. But in fact, humans think best when they are interacting with others. Social activities like debating, storytelling, and teaching activate mental processes that remain
... See more