
I don’t have a problem with PKM as a referencing tool. But step 2 “Organize → Place in buckets or categories” creates all sorts of problem: When you delegate your info into existing categories, at least 2 problems arise: 1. Framing bias: the way presented → way you think → limits the possibilities. 2. Low cognitive load: the struggle is essential for encoding → more forgetting.

PKM tools tend to prioritize the consumption of information over active engagement with it. While they may facilitate the collection and organization of a wide range of resources, they may not encourage users to critically analyze or synthesize that information into new insights or ideas.
Adam Grant • Check Your Pulse #55
Commoncog • Reality Without Frameworks
And lastly, this part’s key – you have to forget everything you think about how to organize your notes. Folders are fine for tax documents, but they’re a dumb way to organize ideas. Your job isn't to arrange everything into neat categories—it's to create meaningful contexts.
Sari Azout • What Matters in the Age of AI Is Taste
That means not organizing by what something is (topics like 'productivity' or ‘technology’) but by the context you’ll be in when you need it—'references for my next essay,' 'inspiration for client work’, or half-baked ideas you’re still marinating on