The genius of the model lay in its creation of multiple, interlocking institutional networks, all operating from the same ethical foundation. Once every sector adopted compatible normative governance protocols, coordination could advance seamlessly — while preserving the public appearance of independent, self-directed institutions.

Current Status: The architecture is now complete and operational, with AI ethics and neuroethics protocols enabling real-time technological automation of expert consensus. Democratic decision-making has been systematically replaced by model-derived imperatives implemented through apparently participatory processes.

The system transforms voluntary ethics into binding compliance through financial and regulatory enforcement mechanisms.

The Mechanism: The 1986 UNESCO Venice Declaration legitimised science as the source rather than servant of ethics, enabling a three-tier control system: (1) Global modeling organisations (IPCC, WHO, World Bank, OECD) generate scenario-based ‘ moral imperatives ’; (2) Ethics networks translate these into sectoral ‘ Good Governance ’ frameworks; (3) ... See more

Yet, none openly acknowledged that they were laying the foundation for what would later become one of the most sophisticated systems of institutional control in history — channelled through figures presented as moral authorities, legitimised by philosophies that render resistance irrational, and reinforced by psychological conditioning that recasts... See more

Küng acted as the master architect, designing an eight‐sector model for institutional coordination; Swidler functioned as the philosophical operator, providing the legitimacy framework; Bailey served as the consciousness‐conditioning strategist, embedding government–religion–education alignment. Each fulfilled a distinct role in building an apparat... See more