This is, by the way, the dirty secret of the machine learning movement: almost everything produced by ML could have been produced, more cheaply, using a very dumb heuristic you coded up by hand, because mostly the ML is trained by feeding it examples of what humans did while following a very dumb heuristic. There's no magic here. If you use ML to teach a computer how to sort through resumes, it will recommend you interview people with male, white-sounding names, because it turns out that's what your HR department already does. If you ask it what video a person like you wants to see next, it will recommend some political propaganda crap, because 50% of the time 90% of the people do watch that next, because they can't help themselves, and that's a pretty good success rate.

Forget Privacy: You're Terrible at Targeting Anyway

Saved by Alex Dobrenko and

RelatedCollections

AI's Illusion of Reason

Marc Watkins substack.com

Hiring algorithms are but one example of a larger set of technologies which promise to disclose some deeper truth about the self or the world that would be otherwise unnoticed. Similar tools are deployed in the realms of finance, criminal justice, and health care among others. The underlying assumption, occasionally warranted, is that analyzing cop... See more

L. M. Sacasas • The Uncanny Gaze of the Machine

Another big issue is that humans—and symbolic models like sets of rules and decision trees—can explain their reasoning, while neural networks are big piles of numbers that no one can understand.

Pedro Domingos • The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World

But computers can also observe patterns and apply them in their decision making without having any understanding of the logic behind them. I call such an approach “mimicking.” This can be effective when the same things happen reliably over and over again and are not subject to change, such as in a game bounded by hard-and-fast rules. But in the rea

Ray Dalio • Principles: Life and Work

A machine-learning model, trained by data, “is by definition a tool to predict the future, given that it looks like the past. . . . That’s why it’s fundamentally the wrong tool for a lot of domains, where you’re trying to design interventions and mechanisms to change the world.”

Brian Christian • The Alignment Problem

Another thing I realized lately, as ML has taken over my critical faculties, is that it’s really only useful for things that are already known by others. I can’t ask ML to give me some new, groundbreaking idea about something - everything it suggests has already been thought, somewhere, by a real human - and this its not new or groundbreaking. It’s... See more

Metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative AI on learning motivation | Hacker News

The fact that the embeddings that emerge from this “magical” optimization process are so uncannily and discomfitingly useful as a mirror for society means that we have, in effect, added a diagnostic tool to the arsenal of social science.

Brian Christian • The Alignment Problem

both beautiful and tragic. It is beautiful because on a good day it requires very little work; you often don’t need to spend much time on the pesky job of feature engineering, and in the best case the machine takes care of a large fraction of what needs to be done. It is tragic because nothing ever guarantees that any system in the real world will

AI's Illusion of Reason

L. M. Sacasas • The Uncanny Gaze of the Machine

Pedro Domingos • The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World

Ray Dalio • Principles: Life and Work

Brian Christian • The Alignment Problem

Metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative AI on learning motivation | Hacker News

Brian Christian • The Alignment Problem

Ernest Davis • Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust