
Saved by sari and
The Rise and Fall of Peer Review
Saved by sari and
In the field of knowledge, the discovery is that allowing free criticism and questioning, granting anyone the right to take part in discussions, and taking all proposals seriously does not result in an inconclusive cacophony. On the contrary, it leads to the rejection of the weak hypotheses and the emergence of the best ideas.
But increasingly published negative results (which include experiments that succeed in showing no effects) are becoming another essential tool in the scientific method.
Research done at the BMJ itself indicates that having the value of a paper judged by the editor, or at least a small group of editorial staff, would be likely to produce just as good results, while obviously being much quicker, much less expensive, completely transparent, less open to malpractice, no more prone to bias, and no longer wasteful of th
... See more