
The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect

Maybe his Midwestern upbringing and the tiny college he went to encouraged his self-reliance and taught him that the surest kind of knowledge is what you construct yourself.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
must master at least three distinct levels of cognitive ability: seeing, doing, and imagining.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
Counterfactual learners, on the top rung, can imagine worlds that do not exist and infer reasons for observed phenomena.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
But what are the messages? This took me quite a few months to figure out. I finally realized that the messages were conditional probabilities in one direction and likelihood ratios in the other.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
The recognition that causation is not reducible to probabilities has been very hard-won,
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
of the data increases, leaving a single objective conclusion in the end.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
having such laws permits us to violate them selectively so as to create worlds
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
.modelthinking interestinh thought that create laws and violate them selectively when required
However, randomization does have one great advantage: it severs every incoming link to the randomized variable, including the ones we don’t know about or cannot measure (e.g., “Other” factors in Figures 4.4 to 4.6).
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
A Bayesian network is literally nothing more than a compact representation of a huge probability table.