
The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect

According to the central limit theorem, proven in 1810 by Pierre-Simon Laplace, any such random process—one that amounts to a sum of a large number of coin flips—will lead to the same probability distribution, called the normal distribution (or bell-shaped curve). The Galton board is simply a visual demonstration of Laplace’s theorem.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
Indeed, the diagram is like the engine of the Bayesian network. But like any engine, a Bayesian network runs on fuel. The fuel is called a conditional probability table.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
The recognition that causation is not reducible to probabilities has been very hard-won,
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
This lack of flexibility and adaptability is inevitable in any system that works at the first level of the Ladder of Causation.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
A confounder will make A and C statistically correlated even though there is no direct causal link between them.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
language. Linguistic barriers are not surmounted so easily.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
How can machines (and people) represent causal knowledge in a way that would enable them to access the necessary information swiftly, answer questions correctly,
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
probability as a guardian of common sense and merely repair its computational deficiencies.
Dana Mackenzie • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
Computers are not good at breaking rules,