Just a moment...
uk.bookshop.orgSaved by Gaia Soykok
Just a moment...
Saved by Gaia Soykok
If they are attempting to be logical, the first person will try to justify what they’re saying by constructing a logical argument to back it up. The second person should then either try to find a flaw in their logical argument, or try to construct their own logical argument to back up their assertion that the person is wrong.
thinking. They embrace a very specific way of arguing and thinking that includes a highly restrictive definition of what constitutes reasonable grounds for moving ahead with a project, a very narrow definition of proof. For analytical thinking, all proof emanates from the past-a general rule handed down from the past, or a set of observations of ev
... See moresoundly but starting from different basic beliefs. So two people can both be logical but still disagree about things.
intuition can sometimes get things wrong. And intuition is what people use in life to make decisions. But logic can help you work out the right answer.
Too often people flail in their disagreements because they either don’t know or don’t think about how they should engage effectively; they just blurt out whatever they think and argue.