
Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction

more than a 5% reduction in risk. It delivers certainty. Both 0% and 100% weigh far more heavily in our minds than the mathematical models of economists say they should.8 Again, this is not surprising if you think about the world in
Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
The strongest predictor of rising into the ranks of superforecasters is perpetual beta, the degree to which one is committed to belief updating and self-improvement.
Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
Now look at how foxes approach forecasting. They deploy not one analytical idea but many and seek out information not from one source but many. Then they synthesize it all into a single conclusion. In a word, they aggregate.
Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
The rate of the development of science is not the rate at which you make observations alone but, much more important, the rate at which you create new things to test.
Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
In 1972 the American meteorologist Edward Lorenz wrote a paper with an arresting title: “Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly’s Wings in Brazil Set Off a Tornado in Texas?” A decade earlier, Lorenz had discovered by accident that tiny data entry variations in computer simulations of weather patterns—like replacing 0.506127 with 0.506—could
... See morePhilip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
When we combine calibration and resolution, we get a scoring system that fully captures our sense of what good forecasters should do.
Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
Now comes the hardest-to-grasp part of Taleb’s view of the world. He posits that historical probabilities—all the possible ways the future could unfold—are distributed like wealth, not height. That means our world is vastly more volatile than most of us realize and we are at risk of grave miscalculations.
Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
the more famous an expert was, the less accurate he was.
Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner • Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
superforecasting demands thinking that is open-minded, careful, curious, and—above all—self-critical. It also demands focus. The kind of thinking that produces superior judgment does not come effortlessly. Only the determined can deliver it reasonably consistently, which is why our analyses have consistently found commitment to self-improvement to
... See more