Second, being wrong hurts us more than being right feels good. We know from Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s work on loss aversion, part of prospect theory (which won Kahneman the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2002), that losses in general feel about two times as bad as wins feel good. So winning $100 at blackjack feels as good to us as losing $50 feels bad to us. Because being right feels like winning and being wrong feels like losing, that means we need two favorable results for every one unfavorable result just to break even emotionally. Why not live a smoother existence, without the swings, especially when the losses affect us more intensely than the wins?

from Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts by Annie Duke

added by Leo Guinan and · updated 1mo ago

  • from Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts by Annie Duke

  • from How We Decide by Jonah Lehrer

  • from 36 Ways to Live Differently by chrisguillebeau.com

    and added

  • from Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts by Annie Duke

  • from Self-Sabotaging Innovation: The Art of Doing Dumb Shit by Matt Klein

    Andrei Stoica added

  • from The Great Mental Models Volume 2: Physics, Chemistry and Biology by Shane Parrish

  • from Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler

  • The Biggest Bluff: How I Learned to Pay Attention, Master Myself, and Win

    by Maria Konnikova

    10 highlights

    Cover of The Biggest Bluff: How I Learned to Pay Attention, Master Myself, and Win