"Saul's [Paul’s] fanatical resistance to Christianity. . . . was never entirely overcome. It is frankly disappointing to see how Paul hardly ever allows the real Jesus of Nazareth to get a word in."

Declaration of Independence in his "Letter to William Short": "Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus."

Pulitzer prize winning poet Robert Frost,: "Paul he's in the Bible too. He is the fellow who theologized Christ almost out of Christianity. Look out for him."

Paul replaced conduct with creed as the test of virtue. It was a tragic change."

"In the teachings of Christ, religion is completely present tense: Jesus is the prototype and our task is to imitate him, become a disciple. But then through Paul came a basic alteration. Paul draws attention away from imitating Christ and fixes attention on the death of Christ The Atoner. What Martin Luther, in his reformation, failed to real

Origen claimed, among other things that the “letters” of Paul were not even written by Paul himself. In fact, he said, Paul only wrote a few lines ever. The books bearing his name were not authentic, he concluded. Origen therefore rejected all of the books of Paul as well as the book of Acts and 2 Peter as not being worthy of study. In fact, many o

is sad to me that this type of inquiry is so seldom heard in the modern church since the debate has literally been raging for thousands of years and has largely been hidden from the masses.

early days (devoured) but then later became like a wolf in sheeps clothing and taught divisive teaching that split the believers apart (divided).

So, then I ask again, is Paul the teacher of Balaam's doctrines who put a stumbling block before Israel and taught Israel to eat meat sacrificed to idols and to commit idolatry? Paul’s own words seem to indicate he taught that very thing!