Grant

No one could credibly claim that Douglass didn’t understand the issue or wasn’t taking it seriously enough. He had himself been a slave, was separated from his family, and was physically beaten in this demonic institution of slavery, yet Douglass refused to surrender his critical thinking just to appease his partners.
Justin Giboney • Compassion (&) Conviction: The AND Campaign's Guide to Faithful Civic Engagement
Lincoln’s goal, in each of these instances, was to balance law against military necessity, in the expectation that the passage of time and the success of his armies would stabilize the equilibria. “If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong,” he wrote in 1864. “I cannot remember when I did not so think, and feel. And yet, I have never understood tha
... See moreJohn Lewis Gaddis • On Grand Strategy
The Civil War came. Ironically, it was in the Senate, scene of the great—and for decades successful—efforts to preserve the Union, that the fuse was lit that did so much to blow it apart. In 1854, Senator Stephen A. Douglas, to get a railroad built that would benefit his Illinois constituents, persuaded his Senate Committee on Territories to report
... See moreRobert A. Caro • Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson III

American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America
amazon.com