Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
when you speak of “strategy,” you should not be simply marking the pay grade of the decision maker. Rather, the term “strategy” should mean a cohesive response to an important challenge. Unlike a stand-alone decision or a goal, a strategy is a coherent set of analyses, concepts, policies, arguments, and actions that respond to a high-stakes challen
... See moreRichard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
The core of strategy work is always the same: discovering the critical factors in a situation and designing a way of coordinating and focusing actions to deal with those factors.
Richard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
To detect a bad strategy, look for one or more of its four major hallmarks: Fluff. Fluff is a form of gibberish masquerading as strategic concepts or arguments. It uses “Sunday” words (words that are inflated and unnecessarily abstruse) and apparently esoteric concepts to create the illusion of high-level thinking. Failure to face the challenge. Ba
... See moreRichard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
A strategy coordinates action to address a specific challenge. It is not defined by the pay grade of the person authorizing the action.
Richard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
The idea that coordination, by itself, can be a source of advantage is a very deep principle. It is often underappreciated because people tend to think of coordination in terms of continuing mutual adjustments among agents. Strategic coordination, or coherence, is not ad hoc mutual adjustment. It is coherence imposed on a system by policy and desig
... See moreRichard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
Two equally skillful chess players sit waiting for the game to begin—which one has the advantage? Two identical armies meet on a featureless plain—which one has the advantage? The answers to these questions is “neither,” because advantage is rooted in differences—in the asymmetries among rivals. In real rivalry, there are an uncountable number of a
... See moreRichard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
Quality matters when quantity is an inadequate substitute. If a building contractor finds that her two-ton truck is on another job, she may easily substitute two one-ton trucks to carry landfill. On the other hand, if a three-star chef is ill, no number of short-order cooks is an adequate replacement.
Richard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
increasing value requires a strategy for progress on at least one of four different fronts: deepening advantages, broadening the extent of advantages, creating higher demand for advantaged products or services, or strengthening the isolating mechanisms that block easy replication and imitation by competitors.
Richard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
An attractor state provides a sense of direction for the future evolution of an industry. There is no guarantee that this state will come to be, but it does represent a gravitylike pull. The critical distinction between an attractor state and many corporate “visions” is that the attractor state is based on overall efficiency rather than a single co
... See moreRichard Rumelt • Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
Nelson’s challenge was that he was outnumbered. His strategy was to risk his lead ships in order to break the coherence of his enemy’s fleet. With coherence lost, he judged, the more experienced English captains would come out on top in the ensuing melee. Good strategy almost always looks this simple and obvious and does not take a thick deck of Po
... See more