Saved by sari and
Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
The current unbundling phase is unsustainable and the long-term media business could look more like the past newspaper model than expected
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
Companies like Memberful, Patreon, Ghost or others could become the platform that Substack is aiming to build
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
There may be fewer niche communities online and lower intent to pay for a subscription
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
High-performing creators may churn from Substack to build their own cheaper backend
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
Journalists might want to be under a brand instead of on independent platforms
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
Consumers may not be willing to pay subscriptions for writing. Or, there may not be a combined $1B/year of demand for writing subscriptions
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
Email could be the wrong entry into paid content. Audio, video or something else could be a better wedge
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
Email subscriptions don’t have network effects by themselves. Right now, there isn’t a large switching cost for a creator to leave Substack – the creator owns their email list and content. The interesting part, however, comes in when the platform provides enough value that a writer would lose subscribers by switching platforms and when subscribers ... See more
Adam Keesling • Explaining a16z's Investment in Substack
Substack has a business model that creates unique unit economics. Substack isn’t trying to build the next The Economist or The Athletic. It’s not branded; the consumer doesn’t need to know what Substack is. Instead, the growth will come from consumers resonating with individual creators.