Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
Show me a neuron (or brain) whose generation of a behavior is independent of the sum of its biological past, and for the purposes of this book, you’ve demonstrated free will. The point of the first half of this book is to establish that this can’t be shown.
Robert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
In her writing, Roskies emphasizes the difference between conscious intention and consciousness of intention. Alfred Mele speculates that the readiness potential is the time when, in fact, you have legitimately freely chosen, and it then takes a bit of time for you to be consciously aware of your freely willed choice.
Robert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
My thought exactly
While it may seem ridiculous and nonsensical to explain something by resorting to an infinity of turtles all the way down, it actually is much more ridiculous and nonsensical to believe that somewhere down there, there’s a turtle floating in the air. The science of human behavior shows that turtles can’t float; instead, it is indeed turtles all the
... See moreRobert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
And when people claim that there are causeless causes of your behavior that they call “free will,” they have (a) failed to recognize or not learned about the determinism lurking beneath the surface and/or (b) erroneously concluded that the rarefied aspects of the universe that do work indeterministically can explain your character, morals, and
... See moreRobert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
If you do X and this is followed by Y, what increases the odds of your feeling like you caused Y? Psychologist Daniel Wegner of Harvard, a key contributor in this area, identified three logical variables. One is priority—the shorter the delay between X and Y, the more readily we have an illusory sense of will. There are also consistency and
... See moreRobert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
I can see this applies to much more complex interactions too. Like relationships
If that’s the case for some baboon, just imagine humans. We have to learn our culture’s rationalizations and hypocrisies—thou shalt not kill, unless it’s one of them, in which case here’s a medal. Don’t lie, except if there’s a huge payoff, or it’s a profoundly good act (“Nope, no refugees hiding in my attic, no siree”). Laws to be followed
... See moreRobert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
As such, depression is the pathological loss of the capacity to rationalize away reality.
Robert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
Depressed people not drawn into the illusion of free will
To reiterate, when you behave in a particular way, which is to say when your brain has generated a particular behavior, it is because of the determinism that came just before, which was caused by the determinism just before that, and before that, all the way down.
Robert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
However, in the Haynes studies, fMRI images predicted which behavior occurred with only about 60 percent accuracy, almost at the chance level. For Mele, a “60-percent accuracy rate in predicting which button a participant will press next doesn’t seem to be much of a threat to free will.” In Roskies’s words, “All it suggests is that there are some
... See moreRobert M. Sapolsky • Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will
So even though there are signals before action. The signals do not always match the action. They may just influence if.