Cutting NIH Indirects is Sensible Medicine
nstead, I would rather see us conduct studies, repeatedly, to learn of our processes are efficient. I would like to see us incentivize reproducibility. And then, if we are able to deliver, I would like to see the percent of funding going to science increase. I believe that in a working society, 10% of health care spending should be on medical... See more
Vinay Prasad • Randomize NIH grant giving
The paper you just read could never be published in a scientific journal. The studies themselves are just as good as the ones Ethan and I have published in fancyjournals, but writing about science this way is verboten.
For instance, in a journal you’re not allowed to say things like “we don’t know why this happens.” You’re not allowed to admit that... See more
For instance, in a journal you’re not allowed to say things like “we don’t know why this happens.” You’re not allowed to admit that... See more
Adam Mastroianni • Things could be better - by Adam Mastroianni Things could be better
Most scientists strongly favor more research funding. They like to portray science in a positive light, emphasizing benefits and minimizing negatives. While understandable, the evidence is that science has slowed enormously per dollar or hour spent. That evidence demands a large-scale institutional response. It should be a major subject in public... See more