But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
amazon.com
But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past

A reasonable person expects subjective facts to be overturned, because subjective facts are not facts; they’re just well-considered opinions, held by multiple people at the same time.
The (seemingly regular) deaths of unarmed
something people really, really need to feel right about, often for reasons that have nothing to do with the weather.
As Americans, we tend to look down on European countries that impose legal limitations on speech—yet as long as speakers in those countries stay within the specified boundaries, discourse is allowed relatively unfettered (even when it’s unpopular). In the US, there are absolutely no speech boundaries imposed by the government, so the citizenry
... See moreThe cultural recession of rock is intertwined with its increased cultural absorption, which seems backward. But this is a product of its design.
There is, certainly, something likable about this process: It’s nice to think that the weirdos get to decide what matters about the past, since it’s the weirdos who care the most.
a greater detriment with our escalating progression toward the opposite extremity—the increasingly common ideology that assures people they’re right about what they believe.
The concept of success is personal and arbitrary, so classifying someone as the “most successful” at anything tends to reflect more on the source than the subject.