updated 9mo ago
- This point rings true to us. That’s why, as we face growing pressure to censor content published on Substack that to some seems dubious or objectionable, our answer remains the same: we make decisions based on principles not PR, we will defend free expression, and we will stick to our hands-off approach to content moderation. While we have content ... See more
from Society has a trust problem. More censorship will only make it worse. by Chris Best
sari added
- One thing mainstream media outlets misunderstand: Substack is not one platform, it is thousands of platforms, and you get to pick which ones to be part of. And Substack has come up with a powerful way to moderate those platforms: Rather than rely on the company to hire a team of moderators, Substack democratized the process, giving full moderation ... See more
from Substack Shouldn’t Decide What We Read by Elle Griffin
alex added
- In its early days, Substack primarily catered to a certain set of internet-savvy writers and journalists, lured by the promise of monetizing a direct relationship with their readers. But as it morphs from a niche publishing concern into a heavyweight start-up mentioned in the same breath as Twitter and Facebook, its user base is proliferating accor... See more
from “There Has to Be a Line”: Substack’s Founders Dive Headfirst Into the Culture Wars by Joe Pompeo
Sterling Proffer and added