An End to Upside Down Thinking: Dispelling the Myth That the Brain Produces Consciousness, and the Implications for Everyday Life
amazon.com
An End to Upside Down Thinking: Dispelling the Myth That the Brain Produces Consciousness, and the Implications for Everyday Life

not increase, but they instead decrease: Participants’ brain images showed reduced brain activity compared to participants who took the placebo.
and feelings of the mind magically arise from the physical matter of the brain? How is it that trillions of cells in the human body come together in a way that allows nonphysical conscious experience to emerge? This is precisely what makes the “hard problem” of consciousness so difficult to solve.
more important fundamental laws and facts of physical science have all been discovered, and these are now so firmly established that the possibility of their ever being supplanted in consequence of new discoveries is exceedingly remote.…Our future discoveries must be looked for in the sixth place of decimals.”43
It dawned on me that there was a need for a comprehensive summary, written for a general audience. It needed to be written by an outsider who hadn’t been tainted by biases of mainstream science. It needed to be written by a nonscientist and a nonphilosopher—someone who simply examines evidence and is unconcerned with what the data suggests, even if
... See moreArizona State University physicist Lawrence Krauss states: “It’s not controversial at all. There’s no scientific evidence for extra-sensory perception.
“extrasensory perception (ESP) abilities.”
Materialism assumes that matter precedes and creates consciousness. We just established that matter’s existence before consciousness is unknown, whereas, with consciousness it is known. So materialism is saying, “Let’s use an unknown, abstract thing to infer the known, concrete thing.”
They referenced studies on near-death experiences—cases in which people were clinically dead, and upon being resuscitated, recalled highly lucid memories suggestive of an afterlife.
Dr. Sheldrake isn’t the only scientist to face these issues. Drs. Barušs and Mossbridge sum up the disturbing state of affairs: “As a result of studying anomalous phenomena or challenging materialism, scientists may have been ridiculed for doing their work, been prohibited from supervising student theses, been unable to obtain funding from
... See more