A Bad Decision on Nationwide Injunctions
reason.com
A Bad Decision on Nationwide Injunctions
Yes, this was for a special purpose—to fight racism—but the Griggs decision made clear that the government was now authorized to act against racism even if there was no evidence of any racist intent. This was an opening to arbitrary power. And once arbitrary power is conferred, it matters little what it was conferred for.
Reader
Hey Pete, care to show us the line in the Constitution where it says a lone unelected district judge can assume decision-making control over the entire executive branch affecting 300M citizens? Any mention of nationwide district court TROs? Or permanent all-powerful bureaucracy?
Stephen Millerx.comA federal judge engaging in lawfare may have just given the prolife movement everything they've ever wanted. Legal status for the unborn. https://t.co/V6yHJDA53z
PatriotDadEV2.0x.com
8-1 decision.
Ketanji Brown Jackson once again gets absolutely embarrassed…
This time Sotomayor (a fellow liberal) explains to her that Trump’s specific plans are not before the Court and that her decision is supposed to be based on the legality, not her personal approval.... See more
🚨 JUST NOW: Chief Justice JOHN ROBERTS joined the liberals and DEI Justice Ketanji Jackson in trying to block President Trump from ending woke grants at the NIH.
The ruling was 5-4. Amy Coney BARRETT, Clarence Thomas, Sam Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch side with Trump. https://t.co/mcg2bt160r